Saturday, January 4, 2014

Branding begins with you.

I have worked with many organisations.
Listened to their hopes and dreams. Their visions and missions.
I have heard — time and time again — that their people are their most important asset. It is almost always the first thing they say in their annual reports and corporate brochures.
But when I enter such said organisations, I find that many of their pledges towards protecting their chief asset becomes lost in the everyday business of…running a business.
Somewhere in the drive to profit and sustainability, these organisations seem to forget their pledge and their people — their most important asset — become collateral damage on their way towards brand glory.
The irony of it all is that glory is an elusive destination when your generals and soldiers keep leaving you every few years. Worse, they may not leave you and you will become saddled with low performers who demoralise their subordinates yet command a high salary.
This is what I keep hearing from CEOs:
“I keep rewarding them but they are still not performing”
“I empower them but they don’t seem to want to take it”
“I can’t seem to attract the younger people to work for us”
Thousands of books have been written on this. Hundreds of courses have been built around the quandary that is leadership. Why is it so hard? And why is it that relatively few companies thrive? There is a Chinese saying: “the fish rots from the head down”. That is perhaps an apt description of many organisations.
We all know that leadership is never a walk in the park. But the key afflictions that I see in many leaders are behavioural ones.
These are the broad categories I’ve observed.
Please Like Me
For example, some leaders are extremely decent and caring but have an insistent desire to be liked, which clouds their ability to be fair or to make the tough decisions.
Do What You Think Is Right (but do it my way)
Then there are those who see themselves as nurturing and empowering. They have an uncanny ability to say all the right things at the right times. They tick every political-correctness box but are really control freaks at heart.
Don’t Mess With Me (please..)
Then there are those who are lovely, gentle and shy but feel the need to embody a steely no-nonsense demeanour so that they don’t get taken advantage of.
I Can’t Decide, So I Do Nothing 
Others are torn between rewarding loyalty and rewarding results in an ever-aging organisation.
Then there are those who are made powerless by government edicts of zero dimissal.  In work cultures like those, there only carrots, no sticks. No matter how badly-behaved an employee may be, they stay. That’s the rule. What you have is a boat with a leak and most of your energy is spent bailing out water to  stay afloat, instead of going full steam ahead toward the required destination.
Crash and Burn
I have also worked with several NGOs which are led by very strong individuals. They have enough force and perseverance to drive their agendas through for the benefit of their core stakeholders, i.e., the people they set out to help.
They spend so much of their energy fighting the cause, saving countless lives, that they sometimes do not leave enough of themselves to fight for their people within.
It is often the cause that unites rather than the leadership.
According to Ed Schein, Author of Organisation Culture and Leadership, 80% of an organisation’s culture is influenced by :
    • What the leader attends to, measures, rewards and controls
    • Leader reaction to critical incidents
    • Leader role-modelling and coaching
The easiest to do is the first one. In a local context, the second one could do with improvements but it is the third point that leaders really need to take notice of.
There are no easy solutions but the first imperative for leaders who want to improve is to look within and recognise who they are as a Leader. In fact, they may find they are more suited to being good, reliable followers. There is nothing wrong with that and in fact, you may have a far happier employee as a result.
Once you have done this, then you can seek ways to address the weaknesses. So business owners who have extraordinary vision in a tech start-up business, for instance, but who have poor leadership skills should hire a Chief Operating Officer to fill in the gaps and help lead.
Others may require long-term coaching to overcome their personal fears and perceptions that limits them as leaders.
Personally, I thoroughly encourage everyone to find a coach.
There is a saying, “Physician, heal thyself” — an analogous exhortation for doctors to first be whole and healthy before they attempt to heal others.
Likewise for leaders. While providing coaching for your employees, you should be coached yourself. Leadership can be lonely and you are never sure if the feedback you get from your subordinates are the real thing, or highly watered down for fear that it may limit the messenger’s career.
Hence, leaders need someone who will not be afraid to give it to you straight in order for you to grow as a leader. Given time, a good coach can spot the BS you tell yourself and challenge you on it.
On coaches
Some coaches badger you into changing. Great coaches, on the other hand, will listen, act as your mirror, guide you and then allow you the make the final decision on the area of weakness you are working on. Ultimately, a great coach understands that no-one can make you change. You have to be ready, to want to change.
“If we don’t change, we will die” said a CEO, after he had embarked on a personal journey to look within, with the help of a well-known coaching course. With that realisation, he saw that to effect change, he was the person that needed to change the most. He stopped playing the nurturing, benevolent fatherly figure and became a fair but firm and caring leader.
Within 18 months, his organisation had a complete turnaround. Low-performing department heads became shining stars. He also acquired the courage to let go of those who could not change.
*NOTE: There are many coaches and coaching organisations in Malaysia. Vistage is one example aimed at CEOs. Arbinger is another. To find coaches, you can contact the International Federation of Coaching.

Friday, July 26, 2013

The Business of Grounding

Over the course of my professional life, I have met and worked with an amazing array of people, many of whom have been women. To me, the truly remarkable ones are those who are able to be steadfast in their focus on reaching a goal.
 
Image from www.pleasefund.us
They do this by remaining grounded in the facts and the reality around them.

They do this by carefully studying the situation.  

They do this by having a deep understanding of the characters at play.

Who makes up the project team? What are their strengths and weaknesses? Their likes and dislikes? Their prejudices and their proclivities?

Thursday, June 27, 2013

Delightful Doodles and What They Tell Us


Google Doodles (we think they deserve a capital ‘D’) are always a pleasure. Sometimes, their themes are obvious – Google graced Malaysia’s 13th General Election with a Doodle.



At other times, we learn things we would other wise never pick up in our daily diet of mainstream, must-know, “what’s-trending” reading. Nobel Peace Prize winner, Wangari Maathai, was the subject of a Doodle for her seventy-third birthday on April 1st this year.




On June 10th, Google outdid themselves. They created a short animation of characters by children’s illustrator and writer Maurice Sendak. A party of his characters showed up for just that – a party. Sendak, who died on May 8, 2012, would have turned 85.



The lovely Doodle is playful and knowledgeable – characters are seen running against a medleyed  backdrop of his stories. Google, one of the most dynamic brands, showed real honour to another beloved brand.

In fact, it shows honour through all its Doodles. Google is willing to get creative with their logo, transforming it into rich, magical pieces of priceless information.

Why is this worth noting? Because, when you work in branding, you will find just how many companies hold their logos sacrosanct. To change a logo – indeed, even to suggest a change – can rattle a company to its core. The general feeling seems to be that logos are there to be revered. Here's a lighthearted example of a brand not afraid to laugh at themselves in a way that resonates with their target audience.

Great ideas beget great ideas. Google allows their designers to have fun. The brand is about empowering people through easy access of knowledge, and this is the best example how they do that in a way that cuts through the clutter. 

How are you using your logo? Is it telling your story or is it confining you?

Does it resonate and remind you of who you are every time you look at it?

Or is it just a pretty piece of corporate garnish?




Tuesday, April 16, 2013

Brand 'You'



Catching up with a colleague over a teh tarik is by far one of my favourite ways of working. It is relaxing, enjoyable and when it ends, a spark of an idea always gets lit.  The idea that day was life directions and how it was akin to branding a corporation.  

When I facilitate a branding process with my clients, I always ask them what the core purpose of their business is. Many of them immediately start rolling out the obvious functional aspect, i.e. ‘I sell this’ or ‘I provide solutions’. And so I get them to drill down deeper as to why their companies exist at all. What was the main reason that got them here? What was the impending need that galvanised them to start a company and become an entrepreneur?  My amazingly creative colleague then said, actually to get to that question, you really have to know who you are and what drives you. You have to know what your purpose in life is.



Simon Sinek, asks us to "Start With Why": and has even written a book about it. For the longest time, I knew that my path lay in service. But I mistakenly read this as saving the world and doing projects that were much larger than what I could handle.

Friday, February 1, 2013

Creating a Global Malaysian Brand


The other day I was giving a talk on "How to build a Competitive brand" to a group of CEOs and one asked how come there were so few great Malaysian brands. I thought about for a second and then answered, "because companies here aren't willing to pay for branding"

Malaysian entreprenuers often think branding or advertising is easy and therefore be done in-house. There is that make-do mentality that is a double edged sword. On one hand, it makes us immensely creative in cutting corners and bending rules, but in the long run, these creative measures don't quite provide the foundation needed to anchor and create a long lasting brand that resonates beyond our shores. We are great do-ers and thrive on quick fixes and quick wins. We desperately need to see some results by the 1st quarter or within 3 months, hence we become a very sales driven culture of push, push, push as oppose to creating a brand centric pull culture.

Wednesday, January 9, 2013

Brand Chaos


The last month or so I have been reading about or have attended talks about speed and chaos: how ‘business unusual’ is the next wave.

Those who thrive in chaos and are able to embrace change; and those that allow a certain amount of creativity, are those that will have the competitive advantage.


Eminent British artist Cornelia Parker 's  'Cold, Dark Matter'. She had the British Army blow up this shed and its contents to create an installation piece now displayed at the Tate Modern in Britain.
It is chaos managed so that the viewer can discern method and beauty.  Even without the background knowledge that this suspended piece was once an actual shed, the viewer can see various components - a hammer head, a bicycle wheel spoke - that reveal this.  'Cold, Dark Matter: Exploded View' offers a new perspective - the idea that even something blown to bits makes sense if the chaos is handled with knowledge and creativity.

Cold, Dark Matter: Exploded view is one of the premier attractions at the Tate Modern
Four years ago I proposed a working brand essence based on this theory of managed chaos, as a platform for creativity and growth. This was for a destination brand, industry lingo for branding a town city or country. The consulting economist, who was with an international design and planning firm, looked at me in horror and said that no investor would look at a destination that enabled or encouraged chaos. 

How times have changed.